Has the Atheros AR5007 driver in your package been updated since the Team OS/2 version was released to support the Asus netbooks?
I am not sure. My package contains whatever someone told me that they got to work.
It seems like the settings in the inf or reg-file - the HKR_ settings are important. Could it be an idea to gather which changes in those values that use to be important, so a user would know what values to experiment with? I guess that not all values are that important. I've documentet the values I had to change on a the intel 3945 abg (Acer One) and on an intel 2200 (T43).
Or is this "already known"?
It seems that it is necessary to have a REG export for the specific machine that you are trying to make work, to get the best results. How portable those exports might be is somewhat questionable. It is also not well known what the various settings might do (one can guess, and if the install *.INF is available, that may give some indication about what settings are for). This does become a problem for those who do not have windows installed. It may also depend on which version of the driver is used. WinXP drivers seem to be preferred, but Win2000, and WinVISTA drivers, and exports, are known to work (sometimes). I haven't heard of any results with trying Win7 drivers and exports.
I cannot test everything (anything), so I depend on people telling me what works, and supplying me with the appropriate files so I can package them in GENMU. I have packaged a couple of experimental ones in the GENMU_TEST package, so that people can test them, and report back to me. Currently, there is one device in there that has not been tested (and one that is good). If anybody has a RALINK [1814:2790] to test with, I would like to hear the results.
I will suggest, that it may be to the OS/2 communities advantage, if everybody would try to get whatever NIC they have, to work with GENMAC (unless they are already supported). The more that we can get to work, the better chance we will have to get something new working later. It is obvious that GENMAC is a dead end street, but since we have nothing to replace it, yet, we do need to try to get more devices to work.
BTW, I am told that the devices that are currently in GENMU will be included in eCS 2.0 GA.