OS2 World.Com Forum
2012.05.23, 16:48:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Article: Is IBM considering an OS/2 redo?  (Read 8026 times)
RobertM
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2011



View Profile WWW
« Reply #30 on: 2010.04.16, 23:37:53 »

Guys, since at 24th Century the scale will change and place warp 10 as a theoretical maximum. So Warp 7 is possible with that scale.

"By the time the Galaxy-class starship was being designed in the 2360s, warp technology had progressed to the point where speeds of warp 9.6 could be sustained for up to twelve hours, although warp 9.2 was considered the "red line". (TNG: "Encounter at Farpoint") "

http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Warp_speed

Martin,

You are such a geek!!!

Oh wait... nevermind, I cant say anything... I'm even worse. LoL!!!!  Grin
Logged

|
|
Kirk's 5 Year Mission Continues at:
Star Trek New Voyages
|
|

cyber
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 253


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: 2010.04.19, 11:22:20 »

And I use same OS as You people...  Grin
Logged
BigWarpGuy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 642



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: 2010.04.20, 15:24:18 »

http://blogs.computerworld.com/15960/could_os_2_come_back_from_the_grave?source=CTWNLE_nlt_pm_2010-04-19
There are some comments for and against OS/2 Warp. I added a couple of my own.  Cool It would have been nice if they had mentioned eComStation (I did in a couple of the replies/posts).  Grin
Logged
miturbide
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1064



View Profile WWW
« Reply #33 on: 2010.04.20, 20:11:14 »

You are also welcome to post comments on OSNews.
http://www.osnews.com/comments/23180
Logged

Martín Itúrbide
OS2World.com NewsMaster
Open Source Advocate

Skype - martiniturbide
Google Talk - martiniturbide@gmail.com
lwriemen
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 61


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: 2010.04.20, 21:14:03 »

A lot of the comments in the CW article were taken from the LinkedIn group,  Team OS/2 Alumni. There are 219 members. Lot's of names I hadn't seen in a long time, and a lot of history in the discussions.
Logged
cyber
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 253


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: 2010.04.21, 00:12:17 »

I'm think that IBM should not be allowed to do such thing.  This will crash today's hardware and software industry. If You have computer that is fast and stable and normal set of software, You probably won't buy new computer and new OS, and bunch of newer applications every next year, because nor hardware nor software have significant better characteristic in such short terms. Or You are lunatic ?
So think about people who produce hardware, new "better" and "faster" CPU and mobo every week, graphic cards, hard drives,...
And people who produce software, new office every year, new mp3 player that now can even download torrents, burning software who in newest version also do video conversion and can translate subtitles to your language, think about all those people who sell antivirus software !!!! Whoa !!!
All those people will lost their job, and become homeless.  Cry
 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!