OS2 World.Com Forum
2010.03.22, 07:52:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: OpenWengo port  (Read 5513 times)
miturbide
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 442



View Profile WWW
« on: 2007.05.17, 04:32:39 »



Supporting thread for the OpenWengo port bounty. The original and old bounty thread can be found here.

Logged

Martín Itúrbide
OS2World.com NewsMaster
Open Source Advocate

Skype - martiniturbide
Google Talk - martiniturbide@gmail.com
miturbide
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 442



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: 2007.07.22, 04:53:52 »


Look, there is another open source VoIP and video conferencing (H.323 and SIP) program. It is called Ekiga, which used to be known as GnomeMeeting.

http://ekiga.org

Logged

Martín Itúrbide
OS2World.com NewsMaster
Open Source Advocate

Skype - martiniturbide
Google Talk - martiniturbide@gmail.com
abwillis
Full Member
***
Posts: 141


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 2007.07.22, 07:54:51 »

http://croczilla.com/zap 
ZAP is an Open Source SIP client based on Mozilla.  I have worked a bit on it but don't know MMPM/DART programing.  I'm trying to work it out but if someone that knows MMPM or DART programming looked at it there are 2 or three files that would need to be built, the rest is just Mozilla code.
Andy
Logged
Paul Smedley
Full Member
***
Posts: 175


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: 2007.07.22, 12:36:09 »

At some stage on play on looking into http://www.sflphone.org - this uses portaudio which we don't currently have for audio in/out - but shouldn't be too hard to implement something.....
Logged
magog
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 89



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: 2007.08.01, 20:01:19 »

Nothing new since Dec. last year on sflphone. Dead or Alive?

The Mozilla based client and Ekiga don't look that bad.
The OpenWengo seems to be very active, but we may need an updated Qt port to 4.x.
There are enough other applications around that have already moved to the Qt 4.x versions.
Some of the stuff used by OpenWengo has already been ported.
http://dev.openwengo.com/trac/openwengo/trac.cgi/wiki/ExternalLibraries

Basically it doesn't matter which one is ported, as long as it works and the project base is active and not dead.
Logged

Regards,
Juergen
*** Java Movie Database - http://www.jmdb.de/
Andi710
Newbie
*
Posts: 38



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: 2008.12.01, 00:12:37 »

Is anybody still working on any applications mentioned in this threat? If there is no interest at all in this bounty, can it be closed and the funds diverted to other, more promising projects? (I am one of the sponsors and would like to see my money go to active bounties)
Logged
magog
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 89



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: 2009.04.30, 17:36:21 »

OpenWengo is dead but the successor is QuteCom:
http://www.qutecom.org/

It's still using QT4 and therefore the QT4 Bounty is practically bound to this one.
Logged

Regards,
Juergen
*** Java Movie Database - http://www.jmdb.de/
diver
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: 2009.05.11, 17:15:05 »

as QT4 is being worked on there is a slight chance to get this done also. all depends if we get enough sponsor units for the QT4 port.

see: http://qt.netlabs.org
Logged
miturbide
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****
Posts: 442



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: 2009.09.24, 16:29:00 »

Hi

I found out that OpenWengo changed it name to QuteCom.

Visit its page at: http://www.qutecom.org/
Logged

Martín Itúrbide
OS2World.com NewsMaster
Open Source Advocate

Skype - martiniturbide
Google Talk - martiniturbide@gmail.com
diver
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: 2009.09.24, 19:04:46 »

this is a known fact Smiley Jürgen already stated it in april 2009:)

as soon as Qt4 is finished we may look at it closer. which does not mean we will work on it.

for me personal all depends a bit how the sponsoring of Qt4 goes further. if it stays like it is at the moment (hardly new sponsor units), i'm not that motivated to port anything i don't need.

regards
Silvan
Logged
magog
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 89



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: 2009.12.17, 01:58:01 »

as soon as Qt4 is finished we may look at it closer. which does not mean we will work on it.

for me personal all depends a bit how the sponsoring of Qt4 goes further. if it stays like it is at the moment (hardly new sponsor units), i'm not that motivated to port anything i don't need.

Hi Silvan, I going to add 100 EUR within the next couple of days so +1% (Edit 1: Just placed the order for the QT4 support...).
I hope some kind of motivation will be there otherwise this has to be done using other hardware (AVM Fritz!Box Router,...).

Edit 2: I re-checked QuteCom but it seems to be dead....no update in 12 month. If VoIP (SIP) should be a target we have to look again for a working project, that can be ported. This still excludes Skype.

The only think I currently have in mind might be something attached to Jabber /XMMP or what the protocol is called. I will look into this area in about 3 month because I'm working on a project which plans to use a settop box for IP-Telephone conversions (big maybe....later even video conferencing). It's an embedded Linux system using an STMicro Chip. First tests will use cameras that stream out H.264 encoded video so for OS/2 and eCS USB supporting the Video Class interface are most likely needed.
« Last Edit: 2009.12.17, 20:46:53 by magog » Logged

Regards,
Juergen
*** Java Movie Database - http://www.jmdb.de/
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!