I disagree that the problem is the Xwp 13. For me the problem is in acpidaemon.exe.
This does not mean that what you have done is the right thing, and I would have done the same.
From my point of view, acpidaemon.exe balances the processes so that some applications or others are better executed. And he does it wrong. In fact it has an option of possible configuration, acpid.cfg, which is a fool fools.
This acpid.cfg, only allows you to configure it to what is most important to you and that works for you.
I explain myself better;
When the processors work like this, type A
No. of CPUs: 8
CPU 1 - Busy: 99.6%, Interrupt: 0.4%, Idle: 0.0%
CPU 2 - Busy: 100.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 0.0%
CPU 3 - Busy: 100.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 0.0%
CPU 4 - Busy: 100.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 0.0%
CPU 5 - Busy: 100.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 0.0%
CPU 6 - Busy: 100.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 0.0%
CPU 7 - Busy: 100.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 0.0%
CPU 8 - Busy: 100.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 0.0%
Some programs work fine without problems. Truespectra, Manhjon approx 10 to 20%
When processors work like this, type B
No. of CPUs: 8
CPU 1 - Busy: 0.0%, Interrupt: 0.4%, Idle: 99.6%
CPU 2 - Busy: 0.1%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 99.9%
CPU 3 - Busy: 12.7%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 87.3%
CPU 4 - Busy: 4.2%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 95.8%
CPU 5 - Busy: 0.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 100.0%
CPU 6 - Busy: 0.0%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 100.0%
CPU 7 - Busy: 29.7%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 70.3%
CPU 8 - Busy: 84.2%, Interrupt: 0.0%, Idle: 15.8%
Other programs work fine without problems, dbexpert, youtube, approximately 80%
What I mean is that with acpidaemon, I can make some type A programs work well, or those of type B work well, but never all at once. Although not all computers are the same, and the behavior on some computers might seem to work at both ends, but when you have programs at both ends that give problems, you realize that you don't.
So what I do is kill the acpidaemon, and I make sure that type B programs work well for me.
Losing those of type A.
Now I'm waiting to be able to execute those of type A.
What I do is create a virtual disk in ram like HPFS this is important in jfs it doesn't work.
I create a folder that contains a lot of files, from 10,000 to 90000 files. And I delete them with another program rm.exe -r g: \ aaa-testfiles000 as part of dtbackup.zip
While the files are deleted, programs of type A can be executed without problems, and most importantly without stressing the equipment, without acpidaemon, and with xwp13 everything perfect.
The greater the number of files I have more seconds for the tests.
https://www.tavi.co.uk/os2pages/utils/dtbackup.zipThe version [C: \] rm --version
rm (GNU coreutils) 8.26 that is in arcaos504 does not work.
Version 5.00 of the rm.exe if it works fine, I think it is slower.
I have the trash configured as delete everything.
All this is an idea that is very green, but I get the feeling that with certain applications running, they help others to behave in one way or another. As a catalyst.