Public Discussions > General Discussion

2ine - OS/2 on Linux

(1/2) > >>

Martin Iturbide:
I can not believe I missed this.

1) On December of 2017.  - December 2017 wrapup


--- Quote ---- 2ine: my OS/2 emulator hit a milestone: it has enough of OS/2 TCP/IP implemented to run FINGER.EXE. And we all learned a very valuable lesson about code segments for 32-bit linear address spaces. I'll explain this in a more technical post after everyone recovers from their New Year parties.
--- End quote ---

2) Jan 21: Project: 2ine - Jan 21


--- Quote ---You have no idea how much effort went into getting this stupid white square on the screen.
--- End quote ---

He made an OS/2 white screen app to run also on Linux. Useless but very interesting. This guy recreated 14 OS/2 functions to make that square show up.

Even that is not my desire to run OS/2 apps on Linux, (Joke) I feel that I need to protect this guy from not getting killed by the Illuminati Brotherhood (/Joke). I will have to check more about this project.

I wish Ryan the best !! While everybody says it is impossible, at least he is trying.

Regards

Valery Sedletski:
Yes. I knew about that from OSNews RSS feed. Very interesting. His approaches are very interesting. I can share some thoughts with him. Very interesting his attempts to implement 16-bit segments tiling, with covering only some areas (not the whole first 512 MB). Maybe, his approach is feasible on L4/Fiasco too. (on Fiasco, LDT is limited to cover only 32 MB, because LDT is limited to 4096 byte -- one page). Also, contrary to his case, I have an idea how I could implement TLMA (Thread Local Memory Area) on Fiasco. OS/2 kernel just does memcpy over TLMA from Thread Control Block (TCB) on each thread switch. This could be done from preempter thread on Fiasco, I think. Linux also seems to have something called Thread Context Hooks, it seems (I saw something like this in Linux-specific VBox sources). But on Linux kernel it requires to run in kernel. On Fiasco, it is easily done from userland.

Regarding that it's useless. Yes, it is not the whole OS/2 ecosystem reimplementation on top of Linux kernel, but still, a good progress. Maybe, it will evolve enough with some time. WINE even has it's own Explorer, I heard. So, maybe they could run WPS some time later ;)

PS: I posted some notes in that blog' comments. More comments should follow soon.

Roderick Klein:

--- Quote from: Martin Iturbide on February 23, 2018, 06:54:40 pm ---I can not believe I missed this.

1) On December of 2017.  - December 2017 wrapup


--- Quote ---- 2ine: my OS/2 emulator hit a milestone: it has enough of OS/2 TCP/IP implemented to run FINGER.EXE. And we all learned a very valuable lesson about code segments for 32-bit linear address spaces. I'll explain this in a more technical post after everyone recovers from their New Year parties.
--- End quote ---

2) Jan 21: Project: 2ine - Jan 21


--- Quote ---You have no idea how much effort went into getting this stupid white square on the screen.
--- End quote ---

He made an OS/2 white screen app to run also on Linux. Useless but very interesting. This guy recreated 14 OS/2 functions to make that square show up.

Even that is not my desire to run OS/2 apps on Linux, (Joke) I feel that I need to protect this guy from not getting killed by the Illuminati Brotherhood (/Joke). I will have to check more about this project.

I wish Ryan the best !! While everybody says it is impossible, at least he is trying.

Regards

--- End quote ---

This is certainly an achievement, I mean that. But I know IBM tried to do this before...
I heard this at possibly one of the last OS/2 conferences organized by IBM Europe about OS/2.
A large customer had lost the source code for an application they used in a lot of shops in large European country.
IBM from what I understood tried to do the same but then ran into trouble rebuilding the API to run the binaries on Linux with a simuliar approach as this developer is trying todo. Its yeaaars ago since talked to this person. So sorry so more details.

That also note that the developer said implementing this is possibly just as much work as the Linux Wine project.
I think the guys who worked on the Voyager partly got stuck with this as well. Its the graphics library in the PMSHELL not called GPI. Reimplementing this is possibly a very big effort.

Its very interesting but I would not be surprised if he would need some hands to help out on this project.
The first releases of Odin also had a PE to LX converter. I think it was ODIN version 0.0.4.  The very large portion of work is working out all of does API's. Including any potential bugs :-)

Roderick

Valery Sedletski:
2 Sergey Posokhov: You seems to confuse something. https://rv8.io/ looks to be like a RISC-V software emulator. RISC-V is a new open source hardware architecture, not a bytecode. There are some development boards manufactured based on this architecture. It is intended as a future opensource replacement for Intel/AMD arch's. At least, I know it being supported by Genode, which is a project I follow too. Note that RISC-V is not yet complete. Genode supports compiling RISC-V binaries for this arch, and running them in another emulator I know, called Spike: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-sim/. https://rv8.io/ is just another RISC-V emulator. I see nothing wrong with it. What is a symptome of illness of software industry?

Also, an author of https://rv8.io/ is Michael J. Clark, whereas 2ine is written by Ryan C. Gordon. I see nothing common between them.

I am a bit sceptical about the idea to run OS/2 binaries on Linux too. But, for example, ReactOS can benefit from WINE. ReactOS has its own kernel, but the user mode DLL's are mostly shared with WINE (though, they need to add some manual modifications to WINE code for porting them to ReactOS. Also, they have an alternative win32 subsystem implementation, called arwinss, which can reuse WINE libraries almost as is).

We also can benefit from 2ine, like ReactOS does from WINE. We can port some code to osFree, and back, so both projects can benefit. ReactOS does contributions back to WINE code, and we can. Also, some ideas exchange would not hurt.

Martin Iturbide:
Hi Valery.

I also support your comments on "We also can can benefit from 2wine, like ReactOS does from WINE."Instead of looking to other projects saying "that is not what I want" or "Its fine but it is missing xyz" it can be more exiting to "add-up" and have two different projects with different goals that benefit together. It can be great to try find some "common ground" when the Linux lovers that wants OS/2 apps on Linux and the OS/2 lovers that want to keep using OS/2 can work together.

Even that I may be dreaming in technicolor and talking without the technical background required, I also think that it may be interesting as a first step to have a full clone of the CPI over a different kernel and "trick" the rest of the components (PM, SOM, WPS) to run on that environment. So, yes, we still will require IBM binaries for PM, SOM, WPS, but it will open the doors to move forward on a long term goal to openness and according to the kernel it runs we may have a benefit of more available drivers and hardware support. But that is still dreaming in technicolor, some will prefer to cut their left arm before changing the kernel :)

At least some of the courseware that I asked IBM permission to republished helped for something :)

Regards

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version