Hi Pete and others,
There is a big change in the jar file jdiskreport-1.3.1_os2.jar 1.405.190, that is a big difference with jdiskreport-1.3.2.jar 1.860.633. Opening the jar tells me that this is not coming from JGoodies. JGoodies programs like this
a
a.class
b.class
c.class
and so on for everything.
Now with the claimed version 1.3.2 I found readable full names like
ExtBasicCheckBoxMenuItemUI.class
ExtBasicMenuItemUI.class
ExtBasicMenuUI.class
ExtBasicPopupMenuSeparatorUI.class
ExtBasicRadioButtonMenuItemUI.class
Now you can't make something like the first and do something like the last. Somewhere you have to call those routines. And as JGoodies has all cut down to a, b, c ,d etc this is almost impossible, you have to decompile the source and your left with a,b ,c etc which makes it not easy to put in something like ExtBasicCheckBoxMenuItemUI.class on the right place. Also if someone is compiling his source down to something shown as a and a.class and so on, I can't believe that in a next version it will show full class names just on the last additions.
And together with the explanation, which is totally bull in my opinion, this makes not that much difference in file size.
Some other strange thing;
jdiskreport-1.3.1_os2.zip 1.211.554
jdiskreport-1.3.2.zip 715.806
This says to me that version 1.3.2 is zipped with a more efficient zipper, then why use a less efficient zipper with the source with as result a bigger file? In the end a jar file is nothing more then a zip file.
So I go the safe side and use jdiskreport-1.3.1_os2.jar. As far as my information goes the next version is 1.4.1, but we need a higher level of Java and is available on the JGoodies website.
Just my opinion,
Joop