OS/2, eCS & ArcaOS - Technical > Internet
Any updates on the Falcon QT browser?
Dave Yeo:
The latest to do from Dimitriy, https://github.com/bitwiseworks/qtwebengine-chromium-os2/issues/3
--- Quote ---With LIBC and GCC fixed, the string functions build fine now. Next stops besides pthread TLS are these (all expected):
LaunchProcess (launch_posix.cc), need to use spawn2 instead of fork there.
UnixDomainSocket (unix_domain_socket.cc, sync_socket_posix.cc, some alignments to features missing on OS/2).
URandomFD (rand_util_posix.cc)
Condition and lock variables (condition_variable_posix.cc, lock_impl_posix.cc, might be related to pthread as well).
Metrics code (histogram.cc, process_metrics.cc)
--- End quote ---
Hakuchi:
--- Quote from: Eugene Tucker on March 05, 2020, 06:48:08 pm ---Otter looks promising but the development even in Windows and Linux is very slow. FalKon is more stable.
--- End quote ---
Some how Haiku-OS guys have managed to make it work on Haiku-OS ...
Neil Waldhauer:
--- Quote from: Hakuchi on March 05, 2020, 08:37:12 pm ---
--- Quote from: Eugene Tucker on March 05, 2020, 06:48:08 pm ---Otter looks promising but the development even in Windows and Linux is very slow. FalKon is more stable.
--- End quote ---
Some how Haiku-OS guys have managed to make it work on Haiku-OS ...
--- End quote ---
Go ahead and post your Otter for OS/2 port. We need a new browser.
Roderick Klein:
--- Quote from: Neil Waldhauer on March 06, 2020, 03:27:38 am ---
--- Quote from: Hakuchi on March 05, 2020, 08:37:12 pm ---
--- Quote from: Eugene Tucker on March 05, 2020, 06:48:08 pm ---Otter looks promising but the development even in Windows and Linux is very slow. FalKon is more stable.
--- End quote ---
Some how Haiku-OS guys have managed to make it work on Haiku-OS ...
--- End quote ---
Go ahead and post your Otter for OS/2 port. We need a new browser.
--- End quote ---
?? Currently the Otter browser can also not be compiled as the webkit.dll is being finished by Dmitry for OS/2/ArcaOS.
I think I asked Dmitry already months ago if the Otter browser could be compiled on OS/2. I do not remember his answer.
I asked him to respond in this thread.
The bottom line is that 80 to 90% of the browser functionality is in the QT and Webkit.dll. The rest if browser depended.
I think the discussion which browser should be ported by BWW is now a passed station. It has been known for months which browser was targetted.
If good *technical* arguments could be given why the Otter browser should be selected.
I think as it stands now for the community a new browser is better then nothing. I have already been stating this for years the Mozilla Sea Monkey and Firefox browser would die on OS/2.
And that is happening now. I personally need to boot in Windows more and more often because a website no longer works in Firefox 45.9 or the website page is not displayed correctly.
Roderick Klein
President OS/2 VOICE
Hakuchi:
--- Quote from: Neil Waldhauer on March 06, 2020, 03:27:38 am ---
Go ahead and post your Otter for OS/2 port. We need a new browser.
--- End quote ---
Nah. I develop only forum posts that gets snarky replies ...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version