It will take a bit of preparation for the last one, so I will report later.
Okay, I did the main machine. The expansion seems to have worked properly, but there is an anomaly that I need to sort out.
As you may know, I am using the QSINIT Ramdisk, which I reformat to JFS. The format works fine, but it needs to be LVM hidden, and add the drive letter again, after a couple of seconds, or long file name support does not work properly. After extending the W: drive, LVM is no longer doing the rename. I see:
[C:\DESKTOP]lvm /driveletter:[ Vol.00 ],R:
LVM0648:
Reboot system before attempting additional LVM commands.
[C:\DESKTOP]help lvm0648
SYS0317: The system cannot find message 0648
in message file LVMH.MSG.
[C:\DESKTOP]
The drive disappears after the hide, but never reappears after the drive letter is added. It appears that the message file is also deficient. I am using the LVM that comes with eCS 2.1.
The odd thing is, that I don't have that problem on the T510, which is almost the same setup. The only difference is that the volume that I merged was only about 5 GB, while the one on the main machine was about 50 GB.
More investigating to do, later.
Doug, I'm just interested what will happen if you remove the second hard disk drive, to where your JFS volume was expanded, from your old test machine?
I believe IBM did everything right, and the data that is stored physically on the second HDD will just disappear from the volume, but I've never tested that. As you say, this is an old test machine, so why not test this?
Interesting idea. I was always under the impression that if one, or the other, physical drives died, that the whole thing would be lost. I think you are wrong, because it is likely that the directory structure will be on the first part, and the data on the second. It is also possible that part of a file will be on one disk, while the rest is on the second disk. At best, it would be an
UGLY recovery. Proving again, that backups are a good idea.