OS/2, eCS & ArcaOS - Technical > Internet

Flash and qt4 browsers?

<< < (2/3) > >>

Pete:
Hi Dave

You piqued my curiosity so I had a look at http://html5test.com/index.html

Seamonkey 2.7.2-12 - Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130108 Firefox/10.0.12 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 result:-

   Your browser scores 329 out of 555 points


Qupzilla Application version 1.6.3, WebKit version 533.3 result:-

   YOUR BROWSER SCORES 184 OUT OF 555 POINTS


I guess the Qupzilla result is in Capitals to draw attention to the lack of html5 capability  :-)

I've posted a bug about the Flash plugin not working - and mentioned that html5 support seems lacking  http://trac.netlabs.org/qtapps/ticket/80#ticket


Regards

Pete



ivan:
Hi Pete,  I don't know if you have noticed but Qupzilla has problems with nested bookmarks as well which is a killer for me.

Dave Yeo:
SeaMonkey 2.14 scores 367 out of 555. It also thinks I'm using lightning 1.9 under OS/2 so not parsing the user agent very well.
I'd think that Qupzillas bad rating is due to limitations in the old webkit though I don't know.

eirik:
Firefox 17.05 (Mozilla/5.0 - OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0) scores 377 of 555.  Performs quite well, and has most of the functionality I need (drawbacks: Java not fully functional on all web pages(= Java not recognized), and for some web pages video not working).

Dave Yeo:
I get the same with Firefox 17.0.11 (Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0). Why does Firefox not report the correct version? Security? I notice they still report the same build date as FF4 though about:buildconfig does report 20140307213027 as the build ID.
Interesting that SeaMonkey reports 10 lower then Firefox built from the same tree and same environment.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version