OS2World.com Forum is back !!!
Remember to visit OS2World at:
http://www.os2world.com
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
ATTENTION
After many years of service, hobbes.nmsu.edu will be decommissioned and will no longer be available. You the user are responsible for downloading any of the files found in this archive if you want them. These files will no longer be available for access or download as of the decommission date.
As of April 15th, 2024 this site will no longer exist.
No one will be able to access this site or any information/files stored on this site as of April 15th, 2024.
OK, tested making the changes on the startup tab. After moving tcpip startup back to the first program to launch and booted set to 3 seconds, 2 seconds and unhelpfully back at 1 second (unhelpfully in that I now have no idea why it was hanging as it no longer does in the original configuration).Large parts of the XStartup code have been rewritten for improved reliability. It should no longer be necessary to impose a long delay to ensure the first object starts properly.How hard would it be to add the initial delay back? I had imposed I think just a one second (maybe 3, I don't recall now) delay to prevent a 30-45 second hang that is now back (I had timed it back then but haven't now that it is back).
I didn't get rid of the delay. It was a global rather than per-object setting, so I moved it to the Desktop 'Startup' tab where you create your first Startup folder. It starts out set to 1 second because there's always a 1-sec delay before XWP does _anything_. Values greater than 1 include that initial delay.QuoteIf the code is still there but just either commented or ifdef'd out, I should be able to build it (assuming my build environment is still good).
I seldom leave detritus lying around - that's what version-control systems are for. If there's a problem with any change I've made, please advise so that I can fix it for all users (assuming it needs fixing).
Never mind, I was able to work around it by moving TCPIP startup to launch second instead of first. Previously, I was unsuccessful in affecting the hang by changing the order.XWP v1.0.16 introduces some of the most significant Desktop usability improvements in years.How hard would it be to add the initial delay back? I had imposed I think just a one second (maybe 3, I don't recall now) delay to prevent a 30-45 second hang that is now back (I had timed it back then but haven't now that it is back). If the code is still there but just either commented or ifdef'd out, I should be able to build it (assuming my build environment is still good).
XStartup
Large parts of the XStartup code have been rewritten for improved reliability. It should no longer be necessary to impose a long delay to ensure the first object starts properly. XStartup's notebook page has also been updated with XWP-Full's Boot Logo option getting its own page.
XWP v1.0.16 introduces some of the most significant Desktop usability improvements in years.How hard would it be to add the initial delay back? I had imposed I think just a one second (maybe 3, I don't recall now) delay to prevent a 30-45 second hang that is now back (I had timed it back then but haven't now that it is back). If the code is still there but just either commented or ifdef'd out, I should be able to build it (assuming my build environment is still good).
XStartup
Large parts of the XStartup code have been rewritten for improved reliability. It should no longer be necessary to impose a long delay to ensure the first object starts properly. XStartup's notebook page has also been updated with XWP-Full's Boot Logo option getting its own page.
Hi Lars
I added the switch and rebooted.
On the Xcenter, I selected the drives folder.
Then I selected drive C which is my USB Fat32 drive
The folders and files come up and then the system hangs.
The good thing is that TOP allows a reboot.
The ArcaOS drives with JFS do not hang when selected.
Thanks for the correction Jar-Erik
FYI: https://5nets.ru/downloads/?/OORexx
Regards
I have lcmd in path but am trying to avoid having to put the dll in the libpath. There is a way when calling the DLL to search the path the the executable is in first, ;.; only helps if you are in the directory that the DLL is in when you launch the executable. I should be able to find the code in Mozilla.Thank you Andi.Yes I was confused by this more than once too. There's included the lcmd_text.cmd (and te.cmd) which calls
I updated my local svn and built it. Thought I had a problem with the executable at first, I tried to test the built lcmd.exe in the directory it was built in and it threw errors but I figured out it was reading the lcmd.rc for building it and the executable needs its own lcmd.rc file. Once I worked that out, it seems to be working well.Code: [Select]start lcmd.exe -rcFile ..\..\lcmd.rc -rcSearchPath ..\..\src\glib;..\.. -iniFile lcmd.ini -logFilter test -logFile lcmd.log %1 %2 %3 ...QuoteOne thing that I would like I would like to see (maybe I can work it out) is to have lcmd.exe look for gl16os2.dll in its own directory first before looking at libpath, this would allow it to run without gl16os2.dll having to be in libpath.I've ';.;' in libpath after the %unixroot% directories.Code: [Select]LIBPATH=p:\usr\local\lib;p:\usr\lib;p:\dll;.;P:\.....So that's no problem for me. Isn't that the usual setup? I mean having ;.; in the libpath (best at the end or after unixroot dirs. Isn't it the standard behavior for OS/2 programs to search their dlls in libpath? Or start it by an object set to run in the programs directory?
Are you asking for some 'special' code in LCMD which loads the dll from the programs directory regardless of libpath setting? Are there some example programs for such?
