1
Setup & Installation / Re: Virtual memory, a curious phenomenon
« on: February 06, 2023, 01:35:09 pm »Code: [Select]
[quote author=roberto link=topic=3232.msg38169#msg38169 date=1675677502]
With reference to Fat32 Cache, the information provided was incomplete, how strange no one is tested
Don't understand what you mean. Do you think someone should try to reproduce your measurements? Then maybe one problem is you're hard to understand. At least I can't follow what you're saying most of the time.Quote
This would be the right thing:What is 'the second cache'? What should be 'canceled'? Do you mean you have to rem out the call to cachef32.exe otherwise it traps?
REM IFS=C:\OS2\FAT32.IFS /cache:2048 /h /q /ac:* /largefiles
IFS=C:\OS2\FAT32.IFS /cache:4000 /q /ac:* /largefiles
REM CALL=C:\OS2\CACHEF32.EXE /f /p:2 /m:50000 /b:250 /d:5000 /S
If the second cache is not canceled, the computer does not start, with a trap in Fat32, or similar failure.
'with a trap in Fat32, or similar failure' - what? Trap or not? At bootup or later? Which trap? Or similar?
Quote
Another question may be that program is the most appropriate to make copies.No clue what you want to say with this. As there is no question mark it seems you make a statement here which I don't understand.
Quote
Also where I say: ......Sorry, maybe my English is to bad but most of the time I can't follow what you're trying to say.
Question - do you have a setting for FAT32 line in config.sys which you have measured considerable faster transfer rate? Please provide old (slow) line and new (fast) config.sys line. And you measured it (both the same of course) and tell us the speed (MBytes/s or 1 file mit xxx MByte took yyy seconds). Thanks.