916
Setup & Installation / Re: Panorama v Snap Video
« on: May 11, 2018, 01:40:37 pm »Given a recent motherboard with Intel HDA graphics, laptop or desktop, DIVE graphics will be quite a bit faster than an ATI video card old enough to have SNAP support.
...which is why we should let the numbers tell the story instead:
Code: [Select]
Sysbench 0.9.5d result file...
Graphics
BitBlt S->S copy : 12452.139 Million pixels/second
BitBlt M->S copy : 297.329 Million pixels/second
Filled Rectangle : 45967.299 Million pixels/second
Pattern Fill : 3505.676 Million pixels/second
Vertical Lines : 173.686 Million pixels/second
Horizontal Lines : 1455.066 Million pixels/second
Diagonal Lines : 69.389 Million pixels/second
Text Render : 873.777 Million pixels/second
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total : 1318.652 PM-Graphics-marks
CPU integer
Dhrystone : 6725.200 VAX 11/780 MIPS equivalent
Hanoi : 23158.000 moves/25 microseconds
Heapsort : 22031.000 Million Instructions Per Second
Sieve : 22031.000 Million Instructions Per Second
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total : 15891.876 CPU integer-marks
CPU float
Linpack : 2877.960 MFLOPS
Flops : 3599.600 MFLOPS
Fast Fourier Transfrm : 2162.790 VAX FFT's
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total : 1421.639 CPU floating point-marks
Direct Interface to video extensions - DIVE
Video bus bandwidth : 1145.600 Megabytes/second
DIVE fun : 3909.899 fps normalised to 640x480x256
M->S, DD, 1.00:1 : 3910.315 fps normalised to 640x480x256
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total : 1461.519 DIVE-marks
I left the CPU benchmarks in case the performance is CPU bound.