Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Martin Iturbide

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 332
1
Internet / Re: Dooble releases-Qt6
« on: Today at 05:06:33 pm »
Since OS2WORD changed its code, I found an issue I think is under FIREFOX and DOOBLE while this doesn't exist under FIREFOX windows
(or a missing code to correctly identify browser width size, environment dependant "CSS" ?)

Sorry Remy, as I explained before, I needed the update the Joomla script on OS2World because I was falling behind with the version and PHP forces to go further or get your server hacked.

The only behaviour that I can explain is:
- Dooble for Windows (narrow) - If the window is narrow it re-accommodate the size layout.
- Dooble for WIndows - if the window is stretch enough it looks as it should. FINE.
- Dooble for OS/2 - Qt5 - No matter how narrow or stretch is the window, the layout looks re-accomodated.
- Otter for Windows - No matter how narrow or stretch is the window, the layout looks re-accomodated.
- Otter for OS/2 - Qt5 - No matter how narrow or stretch is the window, the layout looks re-accomodated.

Just in case I will ask in the Otter forum about why the Windows version is not displaying OS2World fine.

Regards

2
Hello

Just a question here about cdda2wav.exe, (it is compiled on 2007-08-24), it references to libc05.dll (which is included). Do you think it will be desirable to recompile it to reference the libc that is included in ArcaOS ?

cdda2wav is included in cdrtools, right?
- https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdrtools/

Regards

3
Hi Dave

Some came with source code and some don't. Where should I put the source code in the FHS?
Should the source code be unziped there, or just like a zip file?

Regards

If you have the source code (e.g. as archive file) i think that you can put it under :
(something I do when using @unixroot)
all .zip;.tar;.wpi   to   /usr/src/<name of package>

Thanks. I will try later if "%{_usrsrc}" works for us.

4
Hi Dave

Some came with source code and some don't. Where should I put the source code in the FHS?
Should the source code be unziped there, or just like a zip file?

Regards

5
Here goes cdda2wav

6
And the next one AACGAIN.


7
Here I'm trying mp3gain.

No icon creation is done or needed, i think.
I guess this port is "pentium4"

Regards

8
Hello.

I found this news at Slashdot.org
- https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/03/11/1446251/firefox-certificate-expiration-threatens-add-ons-streaming-on-march-14

"A critical root certificate expiring on March 14, 2025 will disable extensions and potentially break DRM-dependent streaming services for Firefox users running outdated browsers. Users must update to at least Firefox 128 or ESR 115.13+ to maintain functionality across Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android platforms.

The expiration additionally compromises security infrastructure, including blocklists for malicious add-ons, SSL certificate revocation lists, and password breach notifications. Even those on legacy operating systems (Windows 7/8/8.1, macOS 10.12รข"10.14) must update to minimum ESR 115.13+."

I was wondering how this affect us, since we are at Firefox 45. Is it possible to get affected with malicious sites? or this just for Add-ons?

Regards

9
Article Discussions / Re: RPM Packages - 2025 (Pentium 4)
« on: March 12, 2025, 02:23:47 am »
Hello

I modified DataSeeker based in the suggestions. And I also wanted to go deep on the icons creations.

But I'm not sure if I made it the optimal way to create the readme and copying icons.

Quote
DATASEEK_READ:WPProgram|Read Me|<DATASEEK_FOLDER>|EXENAME=e.exe;PROGTYPE=PROG_PM;PARAMETERS=((%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/DataSeek.txt));OPEN=RUNNING

DATASEEK_LIC:WPProgram|License|<DATASEEK_FOLDER>|EXENAME=e.exe;PROGTYPE=PROG_PM;PARAMETERS=((%{_datadir}/licenses/%{name}-%{version}/COPYING));OPEN=RUNNING

Any suggestion are welcome?

Regards


Note: I reuploaded the files with some changes.

10
Article Discussions / Re: RPM Packages - 2025 (Pentium 4)
« on: March 11, 2025, 11:36:08 pm »
Hello

So, the suggestion for Data Seeker will be to put on 386, mostly for old hardware that uses RPM. I guess it will not produce any problem on modern hardware that it's default platform is pentium4.

Regards

11
Article Discussions / Re: RPM Packages - 2025 (Pentium 4)
« on: March 11, 2025, 03:50:35 pm »
Here it is FT with noarch.

12
Article Discussions / Re: RPM Packages - 2025 (Pentium 4)
« on: March 11, 2025, 03:31:53 pm »
Hello Dave

Just another question here.

If I have no idea how to the OS/2 program was compiled, like DataSeeker, is it ok to put it on "pentium4"? I personally think it is no harm, but I don't know if it has deeper implications.

Regards

13
Article Discussions / Re: RPM Packages - 2025 (Pentium 4)
« on: March 11, 2025, 01:43:36 pm »
Hello Remy
If interested, you can build a rpm package for AVxCAT  ;)
I think it can be interesting to try it.

My issue with OS/2 native software (not ported from other sources), is where to put the files in the FHS structure. (I think it was discussed before). This is it because I want to adhere (as possible) to FHS and not just drop all files to /usr/bin

For DataSeeker I did:
Quote
%files
%{_bindir}/*.exe                               -> all .exe to /usr/bin
%{_bindir}/*.cmd                              -> all .exe to /usr/bin
%{_bindir}/*.dbg                               -> all .dbg to /usr/bin
%{_bindir}/*.nls                                -> all .nls to /usr/bin
%doc *.txt                                         -> all .txt to usr/share/<name of package>/doc
%doc COPYING                                   -> COPYING to usr/share/<name of package>/doc
/@unixroot/usr/share/os2/help/*.hlp    -> all .hlp to /usr/share/os2/help/
   

Usually the unix/linux ported software uses a lo the "/usr/share/<name of the package>" for extra stuff, but it does not work by default on regular OS/2 compiled apps.

And I think that I never learn how to make the RPM to install on C:\Programs\ or any other part of the hard drive. 

Comments are welcome.

Regards

14
Article Discussions / Re: RPM Packages - 2025 (Pentium 4)
« on: March 11, 2025, 01:30:07 pm »
Hi Martin,
Here it is a simple one for FT.CMD.

Good work. Shouldn't a Rexx script be noarch rather then pentium4?
Thanks for the feedback.
I think you are right about this. I will fix it tonight.

Regards

15
Article Discussions / Re: RPM Packages - 2025 (Pentium 4)
« on: March 11, 2025, 03:53:46 am »
Here it is a simple one for FT.CMD.


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 332