1
Programming / Re: Qt6 Application Testing
« on: January 03, 2026, 07:55:34 pm »https://www.arcanoae.com/wiki/anpm/
You probably need to enable netlabs-exp and update libvpx. Perhaps disable it after.
Thanks,
Saludos
OS2World.com Forum is back !!!
Remember to visit OS2World at:
http://www.os2world.com
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
https://www.arcanoae.com/wiki/anpm/
You probably need to enable netlabs-exp and update libvpx. Perhaps disable it after.
[arcanoae-rel]
name=ArcaNoae stable repository $releasever
baseurl=https://repos.arcanoae.com/release/$releasever/
enabled=1
[netlabs-rel]
name=Netlabs Stable Repository $releasever - $basearch
baseurl=http://rpm.netlabs.org/release/$releasever/$basearch/
https://www.2rosenthals.com/rpm.netlabs.org/release/$releasever/$basearch/
enabled=1
Works using Qt 6.2.12.
- https://smedley.id.au/tmp/qt6-6.2.12-qtwebengine-6.2.6-os2-20250505.zip
Regards
This is a old laptop hp8760w with xeon
Hmm, seems like low CPU score, what are you running? If that's a fast CPU I think we may be getting an overflow in the benchmark code, on my TO-DO list.
So CPU is an 8-core chip, yes?Yes
Can you get me a debug-run on just that drive please?This disk1 is a 1tb sdd, but show 114470mb
DISKIO - Fixed Disk Benchmark, Version 1.25
(C) 1994-1998 Kai Uwe Rommel
(C) 2004 madded2
2020-2024 Dariusz Piatkowski
Number of fixed disks: 10
Number of CD-ROM drives: 2
Dhrystone 2.1 C benchmark routines (C) 1988 Reinhold P. Weicker
Dhrystone benchmark for this CPU: 3308172 runs/sec
DEBUG => using DosPhysicalDisk for $1:
DEBUG => found the disk...
DEBUG => sectors is : 63
DEBUG => tracks is : 14593
DEBUG => sides is : 255
DEBUG => sector is : 512
Hard disk 1: 255 sides, 14593 cylinders, 63 sectors per track = 114470 MB
Drive cache/bus transfer rate: 101216 k/sec
DEBUG => nSector is: 512
DEBUG => nSectors is: 63
DEBUG => nData is: 521773056
DEBUG => nTime is: 5155
Data transfer rate on cylinder 0 : 115738 k/sec
DEBUG => nData is: 594897408
DEBUG => nTime is: 5140
Data transfer rate on cylinder 14591 : 241781 k/sec
DEBUG => nData is: 1239372288
DEBUG => nTime is: 5126
CPU usage by full speed disk transfers: 0%
Average latency time: 0.1 ms
DEBUG => nTime is: 1
DEBUG => nCnt is: 33782
Average data access time: 0.1 ms
DEBUG => nTime is: 1
DEBUG => nCnt is: 37410
Multithreaded disk I/O
1 thread: 116244 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 596800512
DEBUG => nTime is: 5134
2 threads: 109120 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 559351296
DEBUG => nTime is: 5126
3 threads: 108347 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 556254720
DEBUG => nTime is: 5134
4 threads: 109145 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 560899584
DEBUG => nTime is: 5139
5 threads: 108745 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 560254464
DEBUG => nTime is: 5152
6 threads: 111054 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 571931136
DEBUG => nTime is: 5150
7 threads: 111081 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 571737600
DEBUG => nTime is: 5147
8 threads: 110371 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
DEBUG => nTotal is: 566318592
DEBUG => nTime is: 5131
Yup, USB devices...I am looking at ways of checking whether the storage devices that are identified by DISKIO at the start are actually usable, before the attempt to benchmark them actually starts.The disk3 is no disk, no usb conected.
[D:\]cd D:\diskio125
[D:\diskio125]diskio
DISKIO - Fixed Disk Benchmark, Version 1.25
(C) 1994-1998 Kai Uwe Rommel
(C) 2004 madded2
2020-2024 Dariusz Piatkowski
Number of fixed disks: 10
Number of CD-ROM drives: 2
Dhrystone 2.1 C benchmark routines (C) 1988 Reinhold P. Weicker
Dhrystone benchmark for this CPU: 3307018 runs/sec
Hard disk 1: 255 sides, 14593 cylinders, 63 sectors per track = 114470 MB
Drive cache/bus transfer rate: 101023 k/sec
Data transfer rate on cylinder 0 : 116343 k/sec
Data transfer rate on cylinder 14591 : 241957 k/sec
CPU usage by full speed disk transfers: 0%
Average latency time: 0.1 ms
Average data access time: 0.1 ms
Multithreaded disk I/O
1 thread: 116510 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
2 threads: 109296 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
3 threads: 108393 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
4 threads: 108952 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
5 threads: 109710 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
6 threads: 110312 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
7 threads: 110657 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
8 threads: 110428 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
Hard disk 2: 255 sides, 61769 cylinders, 127 sectors per track = 976752 MB
Drive cache/bus transfer rate: 165832 k/sec
Data transfer rate on cylinder 0 : 404224 k/sec
Data transfer rate on cylinder 61767 : 407399 k/sec
CPU usage by full speed disk transfers: 0%
Average latency time: 0.0 ms
Average data access time: 0.2 ms
Multithreaded disk I/O
1 thread: 170925 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
2 threads: 161234 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
3 threads: 158390 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
4 threads: 158535 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
5 threads: 158018 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
6 threads: 158656 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
7 threads: 156967 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
8 threads: 157459 k/sec, 0% CPU usage
Hard disk 3: 12 sides, 512 cylinders, 9 sectors per track = 27 MB
Drive cache/bus transfer rate: Disk read error.
Data transfer rate on cylinder 0 : Disk read error.
Data transfer rate on cylinder 510 : Disk read error.
CPU usage by full speed disk transfers: Disk read error.
Average latency time: Disk read error.
Average data access time: Disk read error.
Multithreaded disk I/O
1 thread: Disk read error.
SYS1808:
The process has stopped. The software diagnostic
code (exception code) is 009B.
[D:\diskio125]
popuplog.os2
12-16-2024 18:45:31 SYS3184 PID 0054 TID 0001 Slot 0086
D:\DISKIO125\DISKIO.EXE
c000009b
0002258d
EAX=00000000 EBX=00000000 ECX=00000000 EDX=00000000
ESI=00000000 EDI=00000000
DS=0053 DSACC=d0f3 DSLIM=bfffffff
ES=0053 ESACC=d0f3 ESLIM=bfffffff
FS=150b FSACC=00f3 FSLIM=00000030
GS=0000 GSACC=**** GSLIM=********
CS:EIP=005b:0002258d CSACC=d0df CSLIM=bfffffff
SS:ESP=0053:000b3878 SSACC=d0f3 SSLIM=bfffffff
EBP=000b389c FLG=00210246
DISKIO.EXE 0002:0000258d
Disk1 is win10, disk2 is ArcaosBut OS/2 is designed around a 32 bit flat memory model, meaning a single segment, and that single segment being a 4GB in size.I have verified this line, and indeed it has to be 4gb, so it has to be changed the MEMLIMIT.exe to 4095,
I've still set up my ArcaOS NAS like this, but I don't see any performance improvements in file transfer.Well, I answered me about the speed tests, and the improvement is noticeable.
I'll have to do more tests.
[C:\]mem /v
Total physical memory: 8 142 MB
Accessible to system: 3 054 MB
Additional (PAE) memory: 5 088 MB
Resident memory: 1 143 MB
Available virtual memory: 3 809 MB
Available process memory:
Private low memory: 344 MB
Private high memory: 448 MB
Shared low memory: 280 MB
Shared high memory: 435 MB
[C:\]cstats
cachesize 262144 cbufs_protected 10288
hashsize 131072 cbufs_probationary 2594
nfreecbufs 248292 cbufs_inuse 0
minfree 8000 cbufs_io 0
maxfree 15000 jbufs_protected 776
numiolru 0 jbufs_probationary 187
slrun 11064 jbufs_inuse 0
slruN 174762 jbufs_io 0
Other 7 jbufs_nohomeok 0
[C:\]cachejfs
SyncTime: 32 seconds
MaxAge: 128 seconds
BufferIdle: 8 seconds
Cache Size: 1048576 kbytes
Min Free buffers: 8000 ( 32000 K)
Max Free buffers: 15000 ( 60000 K)
Lazy Write is enabled
[C:\]
Saludos
IFS=C:\OS2\JFS.IFS /CACHE:1048576 /LW:32,128,8 /AUTOCHECK:*
CALL=C:\OS2\CMD.EXE /Q /C C:\OS2\CACHEJFS.EXE /LW:32,128,8 /MINBUFFER:8000 /MAXBUFFER:15000 >NUL
buffers=20
SWAPPATH=C:\OS2\SYSTEM 0 512000
SWAPPATH=C:\OS2\SYSTEM 2000 1045000
And surprise with the memory, I also attach the memory results with different values. And I really like what I see.[C:\]mem /v
Total physical memory: 8 142 MB
Accessible to system: 3 054 MB
Additional (PAE) memory: 5 088 MB
Resident memory: 187 MB
Available virtual memory: 3 833 MB
Available process memory:
Private low memory: 340 MB
Private high memory: 2 240 MB
Shared low memory: 276 MB
Shared high memory: 2 227 MB
[C:\]cstats
cachesize 32768 cbufs_protected 10302
hashsize 16384 cbufs_probationary 2585
nfreecbufs 18938 cbufs_inuse 0
minfree 8000 cbufs_io 0
maxfree 13000 ** jbufs_protected 681
numiolru 0 jbufs_probationary 255
slrun 10983 jbufs_inuse 0
slruN 21844 jbufs_io 0
Other 7 jbufs_nohomeok 0
[C:\]mem /v
Total physical memory: 8 142 MB
Accessible to system: 3 054 MB
Additional (PAE) memory: 5 088 MB
Resident memory: 187 MB
Available virtual memory: 3 833 MB
Available process memory:
Private low memory: 342 MB *****
Private high memory: 2 240 MB
Shared low memory: 279 MB ******
Shared high memory: 2 227 MB
[C:\]cstats
cachesize 32768 cbufs_protected 10294
hashsize 16384 cbufs_probationary 2594
nfreecbufs 18941 cbufs_inuse 0
minfree 8000 cbufs_io 0
maxfree 14000 ** jbufs_protected 747
numiolru 0 jbufs_probationary 185
slrun 11041 jbufs_inuse 0
slruN 21844 jbufs_io 0
Other 7 jbufs_nohomeok 0
[C:\]mem /v
Total physical memory: 8 142 MB
Accessible to system: 3 054 MB
Additional (PAE) memory: 5 088 MB
Resident memory: 186 MB
Available virtual memory: 3 833 MB
Available process memory:
Private low memory: 353 MB *****
Private high memory: 2 240 MB
Shared low memory: 290 MB *****
Shared high memory: 2 227 MB
[C:\]cstats
cachesize 32768 cbufs_protected 10293
hashsize 16384 cbufs_probationary 2590
nfreecbufs 18944 cbufs_inuse 0
minfree 8000 ** cbufs_io 0
maxfree 15000 ** jbufs_protected 750
numiolru 0 jbufs_probationary 184
slrun 11043 jbufs_inuse 0
slruN 21844 jbufs_io 0
Other 7 jbufs_nohomeok 0
Pay attention that I'm using two swappaths, although only the last one is used, I haven't really tried to remove the first one, in case there is a difference or not.