541
Applications / Re: Firefox 31.8.0 Beta 5 - First Impressions
« on: August 28, 2015, 03:23:43 pm »As far as I know the "." dot entry translates as active directory. SoNot true. DLLs were only unloaded on exiting an app. If you open
if you have DLL's in other drives, directories which are not in your
config.sys, then they should not disturb the process.
another app wich requires a DLL with the same name, the function were
taken from the already loaded DLL. That's the reason why program
packages should never hold commonly used and shared DLLs in there dir
tree. Only those DLLs should be better installed to a common dir.
Unfortunately our OS doesn't came with a DLL or packet manager that
controls each of these files. Solutions were developed, but either
have too many flaws or are still not fully accepted.
I have more problems in identifying DLL's if they are the rightThere exists the 8.3 limitation for DLLs. Therefore sometimes the
version and with the latest distribution for FF needed dll's it seems
that certain dll's are smaller, have lower version numbers etc.
filename can't contain the entire version number.
Thanks to config.sys and the way it works we can update dll's in aThat's not true. That would be possible for all other OS, too. Plus
very easy way which is not seen in other OS systems.
most of them support long DLL names and symbolic links.
but I see the need for clear identification of DLL's, so everyone canThat tool doesn't exist yet. Additionally, there exist too many older
copy the right one in the right directory.
packages that are linked to DLLs without version numbers in their
filenames. It just won't work now if you just copy everything to one
dir. You have to DLL-rename all these older packages first.