Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jochen Schäfer

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
Article Discussions / Re: Qt 5 Base for OS/2
« on: August 16, 2019, 02:57:05 pm »
OK, I will try update via yum, when I'm home again.

2
Article Discussions / Re: Qt 5 Base for OS/2
« on: August 16, 2019, 02:29:47 pm »
With ANPM. I start the upgrade. Libc stops the installation with the message, that I must reboot and then start update again.
I rebooted and restarted ANPM. Then comes the message.

klusrmgr 1.2.2 was installed (at least according to the RPM DB), but 1.2.1 was still there. I had to clean up the duplicates.

3
Article Discussions / Re: Qt 5 Base for OS/2
« on: August 16, 2019, 08:23:54 am »
I get this error: "Datei /@unixroot/usr/bin/pwd_mkdb.exe aus der Installation von libc-1:0.1.2-1.oc00.i686 kollidiert mit der Datei aus dem Paket klusrmgr-1.2.1-1.oc00.i686", meaning pwd_mkdb.exe is both in libc and klusrmgr.

4
Programming / Re: Which debugger to use.
« on: August 13, 2019, 08:06:57 am »
Thanks. I will try that.

5
Programming / Which debugger to use.
« on: August 12, 2019, 03:05:32 pm »
I want to check, if things are still working as they should in DosBOX/2.
I tried Watcom, but GUI one instantly crashes, when I run DosBOX. The VIO one does not do that, but I can't find an option to select sources.
When I started the port about 15 years ago, I used one of the IBM debuggers in the VAC 4 package, but I just have not been able to set it up correctly at the moment, so I have to really should take a deep dive into them.

So my questions is: Which debugger are you using for GCC compiled and Watcom linked, rpm only applications?
Any configuration recommendations?

6
Mail-News / Re: Security fixes for Mozilla
« on: July 23, 2019, 11:54:17 am »
Can we help?

7
Mail-News / Re: Security fixes for Mozilla
« on: July 22, 2019, 09:44:01 am »
I tested your version and I can verify that it works well.
Will you continue to integrate more features from TenFourFox?


8
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 14, 2019, 07:41:30 pm »
I have replaced the first version with a version with correct attribution.

9
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 14, 2019, 06:20:44 pm »
Oh, I'm very sorry. You are correct. I just copy and paste it from the wrong place, it seems.
When, I get home, I correct it and upload the correct version.

10
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 14, 2019, 08:51:23 am »
I used Andreas' scripts and David's great icons to build package.
Can somebody else please test it. It looks good to me.

11
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 13, 2019, 10:18:53 am »
Wow, this gets better and better ;-)
Thank you all for the support.

12
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 11, 2019, 07:12:36 pm »
Hi Andreas.

Big thanks for the Warpin scripts. I will test them.


Bye Jochen

13
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 10, 2019, 08:31:32 am »
I don't know anymore. Perhaps it was the DOSBOX configure script acting up.
In the end, it comes down to me wanting to produce the RPM packages for the dependencies, but not being able to.
I wanted to look into the SDL source package, anyway. Perhaps there I can unearth something.

14
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 09, 2019, 11:31:33 pm »
I find it the best method to avoid inclusion of these files. That applies also to libcn. If you want to support people who defer to use RPM/YUM, I see it as the only option to provide the required files in a separate package. (Steve Wendt did that for Mozilla versions.) With "package" I mean also "file". That means: create a special .wpi with these DLLs, but better keep them quite hidden to ensure people don't install them by mistake.

Dave has already described what the biggest problem for other apps may be. So, easiest is to just refer to the "yum install" command to install the prerequisites. What WarpIN can do, is to check for prerequisites and defer installation without it. Let's see, if I find time during the weekend to give examples and to add that to the Dosbox .wis script.
Very helpful remarks. Since 15 years, I on and off release some Warpin packages for DOSBOX. Nobody ever complained about how I package it or suggested how to do it better.
Thank you Andreas and Dave.

15
Applications / Re: Discussion about RPM/YUM and Libcn
« on: May 09, 2019, 11:24:11 pm »
How are you building Dosbox, GCC or OpenWatcom? And likewise with the SDL libraries?
GCC 4, SDL from RPM.
I have to built the SDL dependencies like Ogg, SDL_net statically. I'm not able to build DLLs from them.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7