I was trying to get them to Open Source it or Update the OS/2 version, but apparently they gauged interest here or on a newsgroup and we did not respond positively so they have officially dropped the OS/2 version.
Email Thread (Top - Recent, Bottom - Older)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
synper311@aol.com schrieb:
> I know. Do you know about eComStation? It is the continuation of IBM OS/2 by Serenity Systems and Mensys. The newest version (2.0) is coming out May 14th 2010 (So only a few days

).
>
> There is still an active community, especially on
www.os2world.comFor us - we asked for interest, a while ago - less than 50 people. This is nothing we can care for, because of we have to make our living from Papyrus ...
>
> We have to pay for a support licence to get OpenOffice.Org so there is a demand for an up-to-date office suite. However, I think that you and your team should look at the ODT and OOXML specifications for support in your product as both standards are becoming widely used in the Linux/Mac/Win world, and even in our little OS/2 corner.
>
We would have loved to support the great OS/2 System much longer ... So, please blame IBM for their stupid decisions, not us :-)
synper311@aol.com schrieb:
> Ah, that is a shame. Well, thank you in any case. I appreciate that you did at one point support OS/2 even if it is no longer viable

>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ramps <Ramps@papyrus.de>
> To: synper311@aol.com
> Sent: Tue, May 11, 2010 4:28 am
> Subject: Re: Papyrus Office for OS/2
>
> Sorry, no. Too much cross interests in Win and Mac, which are still running.
>
> synper311@aol.com schrieb:
>> Would you consider Open Sourcing the OS/2 version or allowing it to be donwloaded for free?
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ulli Ramps <Ulli.Ramps@papyrus.de>
>> To: synper311@aol.com
>> Sent: Mon, May 10, 2010 10:01 am
>> Subject: Re: Papyrus Office for OS/2
>>
>> Sorry, no further development - too less interest.
>>
>> synper311@aol.com schrieb:
>>> Hey guys, was wondering if you were still developing/supporting Papyrus office for IBM OS/2?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Brett