COM performance hints with 16550

 Area Os2, Msg#1586, Sep-09-92 09:52PM From: Wilson Navarro To: All Subject: 16550 under os2

I found this message on internet. I hope it helps someone understand com ports under OS/2.

Article 11617 (102 more) in comp.os.os2.misc: From: db3l@ans.net (David Bolen)

Subject: COM performance hints with 16550 Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 20:18:53 GMT Organization: Advanced Network & Services, Inc. - Elmsford, NY Lines: 325

Warning: This is pretty long, but there's a summary at the end. If you just want to see a brief statement now:

If you have a 16550, have a serial device that keeps DSR high while it is on (I think most modems do this by default, or are configurable), doesn't do hardware flow control, or doesn't mind getting up to 15 characters after dropping CTS and/or DSR, make sure you set BUFFER=ON when configuring your COM port with the MODE command. With default settings, BUFFER=AUTO is really no different than BUFFER=DISABLED.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I recently obtained a copy of the OS/2 physical device driver reference and was reading through the information about the async drivers (COM/VCOM.SYS).

From the number of posts on the subject (some from myself), it seems that a number of people are confused about what the various MODE COM settings mean, and what sort of setup was the most efficient use of COM ports when a 16550 UART was present (which seems to be universally regarded as a good idea to have in order to gain good performance). I normally use OS/2 COM programs with the RTS=HS,BUFFER=AUTO settings (as is normally recommended on the net and in the FAQ) and wondered if I was fully exploiting the capabilities of my 16550. In addition, I was still having problems with DOS environment programs (notably kermit 3.11 that just dies a horrible death) and hoped to learn a bit about how that might be improved.

After reading a bit, and performing some experimentation, I've come up with the following information and conclusions that may help other people with the 16550s. I don't place any guarantees on this information, other than that it is accurate to the best of my knowledge and seems to be backed up by my experimental results. I hope it proves helpful, or at least helps to explain the relationship between some of the MODE parameters and the use of the FIFO buffers provided by the 16550.

(in the following, when I use the term 16550, the OS/2 drivers actually require an NS-16550A or compatible chip, and I believe the current level chips as discussed previously in the OS/2 groups are 16550AFN or 16550AF)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Introduction:

The 16550 provides for a 16-character receive hardware buffer that can be set to generate an interrupt every 1, 4, 8 or 14 characters. It can also hold up to 16 characters in a transmit buffer, generating an interrupt only when that buffer is empty. In other words, in its most efficient mode, the 16550 can handle transmission and receipt of data in roughly 16-byte chunks, only interrupting the CPU at the end of each chunk.

Note that even if you don't make use of the extended buffering from the point of view of interrupt handling, but still receive an interrupt for every character received or transmitted, the 16550 buffer can be helpful, as it can buffer received characters if the COM handler misses an interrupt, thereby preventing receive overruns.

The OS/2 COM driver can fully exploit these capabilities of the 16550 depending on how it is configured. Here's the rub though - if you take the default COM settings, and even if you use MODE to set the BUFFER parameter to AUTO, the COM driver is only partially using the capabilities of the UART. In other words, the settings that are normally posted to these groups, and are in the FAQ are not the most efficient settings. In fact, from what I can tell, a BUFFER value of AUTO is no better than DISABLED with the other defaults for the modem signaling values.

COM Driver Settings (MODE): --

The extended hardware buffering mode of the async driver can be controlled via the BUFFER parameter of the MODE command. It can take on three values:

ON        Set transmit/receive triggers to fully exploit buffering. (16-character transmit/receive queues for 16550). OFF       Set transmit/receive triggers to a single character. AUTO      "Automatic Protocol Override". Adjust the transmit/receive triggers according to handshaking protocols in effect.

The "handshaking protocols" for AUTO mode use the following signals:

RTS = Request To Send          ( Signals FROM OS/2 COM Driver ) DTR = Data Terminal Ready CTS = Clear To Send            ( Signals TO OS/2 COM Driver ) DCD = Data Carrier Detect DSR = Data Set Ready

and refer to the following:

* Input Sensitivity using DSR - MODE option IDSR, default ON       - If this setting is ON, then the driver will only accept data from the device while the DSR line is active. * Output Handshaking using CTS, DSR, DCD - MODE options OCTS, ODSR, default is both ON       - No MODE option for DCD - MODE always sets it OFF - This setting controls whether CTS, DSR or DCD are used to control the flow of data to the modem. If any of these settings are ON, the driver stops giving data to the transmit hardware as soon as         the corresponding control signal drops. * RTS Control Mode - MODE option RTS, default is ON. Can be one of the following: + Enabled                                             [MODE=ON] + Disabled                                            [MODE=OFF] + Input Handshaking (RTS drops on input queue full)   [MODE=HS] + Toggling on Transmit (RTS drops unless transmitting) [MODE=TOG] - This setting controls how the RTS signal is controlled by the driver. If ON, DTR is used to signal when the COM port is         active, while if HS, DTR is used to control the flow of data from the modem. * DTR Control Mode - MODE option DTR, default is ON. Can be one of the following: + Enabled                                             [MODE=ON] + Disabled                                            [MODE=OFF] + Input Handshaking (DTR drops on input queue full)   [MODE=HS] - This setting controls how the DTR signal is used to control the flow of data. - This setting controls how the RTS signal is controlled by the driver. If ON, DTR is used to signal when the COM port is         active, while if HS, DTR is used to control the flow of data from the modem.

A typical default configuration for the COM port is (ignoring some of the MODE parameters not relevant to this post):

IDSR = ON              ODSR   = ON        OCTS = ON               DTR    = ON        RTS  = ON               BUFFER = AUTO

And most suggestions for configuring the COM port for better control explicitly set RTS=HS, and BUFFER=AUTO, so I expect that many people are running with the above settings, except with RTS=HS, allowing full hardware flow control (RTS/CTS) to the modem.

Setting Interaction: ---

For the purposes of this post (getting the most performance out of the 16550), the only settings that are really important from the above discussion are the "Extended Hardware Buffering" (BUFFER), "Input Sensitivity using DSR" (IDSR), and "Output Handshaking using CTS, DSR, DCD" (OCTS,ODSR).

Here's the basic problem. In order to accomplish the latter two settings in their default modes, the AUTO buffering mode basically stops using the FIFO buffers. In particular, the following adjustments are "automatically" made:

* If IDSR is enabled, then the COM driver is set up to respond to a lowering of the DSR signal within one character time. To ensure this, the driver adjusts the receive trigger to be a single character. In other words, it lets the 16550 generate an interrupt per character. The full 16-character receive buffer is still available to prevent receive overruns, and the transmit trigger is not adjusted. * If either OCTS, ODSR (or ODCD - only changeable from a program) are enabled, then the device driver will respond to a lowering of the appropriate signal within a single character time. To do this, the transmit trigger is lowered to a single character - the 16550 is set to generate a transmit interrupt for each character, although the receive trigger is not adjusted.

The reason both of these automatic adjustments are made is to take the safe course, and assume that anything using those signals has been designed to assume that the signals take action within a single character time. For example, without fixing the transmit trigger, the modem could lower the CTS signal, but the 16550 might continue transmitting up to 15 characters that might still be in the FIFO transmit queue.

Of course, the problem is that with the default settings, both of these rules come into effect, and the driver ends up getting an interrupt per character for both transmitting and receiving characters. In other words, you end up using the 16550 just like any lower UART, with the single advantage that the receive FIFO buffer on the chip helps avoid receive overruns.

Improving Settings --

In order to make more effective use of the 16550, you can do one of three things:

* Explicitly set the extended buffering on (MODE BUFFER=ON). * Disable IDSR sensitivity (MODE IDSR=OFF) * Disable any output flow control (MODE OCTS=OFF,ODSR=OFF)

Of the three, I generally prefer the former, but you may have reasons to do one of the latter two. By explicitly setting the buffering on, you will override the rules above that adjust the receive and transmit triggers. What this means is that you may receive extraneous data if DSR is actually being used to signal input and that if the modem asks the driver to stop sending data (CTS), it may still receive up to 15 more characters.

I don't think either of these problems should hit most people using modems today. I believe most modems hold DSR high while they are on (or at least are configurable to do this), and most modems that handle hardware flow control (RTS/CTS) drop CTS before they are absolutely out of room. For example, the USR Courier v.32bis modem I have has a transmit buffer of 1.5K (3.25K for error control connections) and drops CTS when the buffer is 90% full (plenty of room for 15 extra characters). But of course, for a specific case the second or third choice can be made, which will make better use of the 16550 than the default settings, but not the best.

Some experiments

Just to see if any of the stuff I was learning seemed to apply, I ran some quick tests. Nothing extremely scientific - just a couple of quick file transfers.

Using a SLIP connection (TCP/IP over a serial line), with USR v.32bis modems on either end, I transferred a reasonably sized (115K or so) file down from a workstation. My COM port was set at 38.4K. The transfer was from the workstation back to my machine so I was mostly testing the receive characteristics although the program used (FTP) does transmit data during the transfer.

I tested using both the normal COM port settings (plus RTS=HS), and then with BUFFER=ON rather than AUTO. Also, I first ran the transfers without anything else occurring on the system, and then re-ran the same transfers with a PM monitor (one of the ones from ftp-os2 - pmload11.zoo). The results were interesting:

FTP Transfer Time (binary mode, size = 114688 bytes) MONITOR     BUFFER          Time (s)        Rate (cps)      Load (%) -  No           Auto            41              2797            N/A No          On              41              2797            N/A

Yes         Auto            53              2164            98-100 Yes         On              41              2797            82-86

When nothing else was running, BUFFER didn't really make much of a difference. I guess this just meant that my machine itself was fast enough to keep up with an interrupt a character in general. I presume though (given the next set of results) that the load on the system in the On mode was much less.

When something was running (even the load program, as a PM program, takes up CPU time and interferes with running applications - I had it iconized, so it had to update the icon each second), things were very different. In Auto mode, I got a much worse transfer time, and my system load was pretty much pegged at 100%. In On mode, I got as good a transfer time as when nothing else was running, but at a much smaller load on the machine.

So I think this is pretty strong evidence that using BUFFER=ON is very different than BUFFER=AUTO when the other signaling settings are using their default values.

Virtual COM Driver (DOS Boxes) --

After reading about VCOM (of which little is written), I don't see a magic pill for DOS box users, other than that a BUFFER=ON setting should help lower the CPU load and make it easier to keep the virtual interrupt rate up in the DOS environment.

There was one discovery I did make however, that may help some people out. VCOM supports two modes of accessing the COM ports - either through BIOS calls or via virtual I/O ports. The virtual I/O ports only emulate the lower end INS8250 UART, and as others have noted, the virtual interrupt rate is limited to around 1000Hz or so.

Since I figured it had something to do with the virtual I/O ports that was causing the most problem with kermit, I reset kermit to use BIOS1 as its method for accessing the COM port. Although access through the BIOS is technically limited to 9600 baud maximum, I was able to run kermit without a failure, including file downloads. When letting kermit use the virtual I/O port, I'd generate traps at rates even as low as 2400 baud.

I think this behavior arises from the fact that when the application is controlling the hardware directly, it is issuing a lot more I/O requests to the virtual I/O port that must be handled by VCOM. With the BIOS interface, the application basically asks BIOS for a character, and gets them back one at a time. Since VCOM goes off to COM to get the character, all of the hardware flow control and buffering used by COM is available to VCOM, and the DOS application doesn't have to concern itself with anything.

So - if someone else is trying to run a COM program in a DOS box and it can use BIOS to access the COM port rather than trying to run the hardware itself you may be able to get it working reasonably. At the very least, it gave me a way to test the DOS version of kermit some of my users use from home at a reasonable speed (although not as high as I would like) from within a DOS box.

Summary ---

An important aspect of the support for 16550 UARTs within the OS/2 2.0 COM driver is the interaction between various modem control handshaking settings and the automatic control of extended buffering. In particular, several of the default COM port settings (IDSR=ON,OCTS=ON,ODSR=ON) when automatic control (BUFFER=AUTO) is enabled force the driver not to use the enhanced buffering of the 16550, and instead generate interrupts for each character transmitted or received. This can decrease performance and definitely places a heavier load on the machine.

The easiest way to solve this is to use a setting of BUFFER=ON rather than BUFFER=AUTO, as long as it won't cause problems overrunning your modem or receiving extraneous information (see "Improving Settings" above). I don't think many users will encounter a problem if they make these changes. From my experiments, switching to BUFFER=ON can decrease the load on a 16MHz 386 by at least 15%, while allowing the same transfer rate on a busier system.

For the DOS Box, one hint to users trying to get reasonable performance out of DOS COM applications - BUFFER=ON may also help this situation, but if you can live with 9600 baud, and your application supports using the BIOS interface to the COM port, try using that mode. You may be to run the application successfully at higher data rates through the emulated BIOS interface than if the application tries to use the emulated COM hardware directly.

I hope someone else finds this information useful - I know it's helped me to get a better handle on how OS/2 manages the COM port, and how various settings affect its use of the capabilities of my 16550 UARTs.

-- -- David -- /---\ \             David Bolen             \  Internet: db3l@ans.net      / |  Advanced Network & Services, Inc.   \   Phone: (914) 789-5327   | / 100 Clearbrook Road, Elmsford, NY 10523 \   Fax: (914) 789-5310    \ \ ---/

