Rating for Supported Hardware: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "When we try to document supported hardware on OS/2, ArcaOS or eComStation it can be interesting to have a general rating of how the hardware perfors on the plataform. The ge...") |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The general idea will be to have this basic rating for it: | The general idea will be to have this basic rating for it: | ||
* Very Good | * Very Good {{VeryGood}} | ||
* Good | * Good {{Good}} | ||
* Average | * Average {{Average}} | ||
* Bad | * Bad {{Bad}} | ||
But the raiting may be subjective perception accordind to the person reading it. This is why the following baseline is set: | But the raiting may be subjective perception accordind to the person reading it. This is why the following baseline is set: | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Hardware]] | [[Category:Hardware Reviews]] |
Latest revision as of 22:46, 3 January 2021
When we try to document supported hardware on OS/2, ArcaOS or eComStation it can be interesting to have a general rating of how the hardware perfors on the plataform.
The general idea will be to have this basic rating for it:
But the raiting may be subjective perception accordind to the person reading it. This is why the following baseline is set:
For Laptops
- Very Good: ore than the 75% of components works.
- Good : More than the 50% of components works. (Glass half full)
- Average: OS/2 can boot but it is unrealiable or less than 50% of the Latop components work.
- Bad: It means you can not even boot OS/2-ArcaOS-eCS on this machine.