Rating for Supported Hardware: Difference between revisions

From OS2World.Com Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "When we try to document supported hardware on OS/2, ArcaOS or eComStation it can be interesting to have a general rating of how the hardware perfors on the plataform. The ge...")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


The general idea will be to have this basic rating for it:
The general idea will be to have this basic rating for it:
* Very Good
* Very Good {{VeryGood}}
* Good
* Good {{Good}}
* Average
* Average {{Average}}
* Bad
* Bad {{Bad}}


But the raiting may be subjective perception accordind to the person reading it. This is why the following baseline is set:
But the raiting may be subjective perception accordind to the person reading it. This is why the following baseline is set:
Line 16: Line 16:




[[Category:Hardware]]
[[Category:Hardware Reviews]]

Latest revision as of 22:46, 3 January 2021

When we try to document supported hardware on OS/2, ArcaOS or eComStation it can be interesting to have a general rating of how the hardware perfors on the plataform.

The general idea will be to have this basic rating for it:

  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Average
  • Bad

But the raiting may be subjective perception accordind to the person reading it. This is why the following baseline is set:

For Laptops

  • Very Good: ore than the 75% of components works.
  • Good : More than the 50% of components works. (Glass half full)
  • Average: OS/2 can boot but it is unrealiable or less than 50% of the Latop components work.
  • Bad: It means you can not even boot OS/2-ArcaOS-eCS on this machine.